Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur L. Aidala

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Arthur L. Aidala}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Arthur_L._Aidala Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Arthur L. Aidala}})

This is an unreferenced BLP of a lawyer. There are some inline links but none of these are any help in establishing notability, as they're either dead, not independent or links to the homepages of organisations he's associated with. Searches aren't finding any in-depth, independent coverage of him which we need for a BLP. Neiltonks (talk) 09:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Attorneys aren't noteworthy just because they handle some noteworthy cases. Attorney succeeding with a novel defense is "attorney doing job" which isn't noteworthy. Absense of NPOV reliable secondary sources is big indication here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcfnord (talk • contribs) 00:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.