Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Nozik

:{{la|Arthur Nozik}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Arthur Nozik}})

I have been unable to find sufficient sources to demonstrate notability. PROD was removed with the argument that "[Prof. Nozik] surpasses WP:PROF criterion 1 and WP:GNG by miles", but I can't find any evidence of this. He has certainly produced a considerable body of work (see hits in gscholar), but doesn't appear to have been widely commented on in independent reliable sources, which are the requirement for WP:PROF1 and WP:GNG. Open to an early close if such sources are provided, and will withdraw nom if that happens. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn Yunshui 雲‍水 14:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

:You could start by looking at the search results automatically linked by the nomination process. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

KEEP: Seems to me to easily pass WP:prof - loads of well cited papers (H index >40?), served as senior editor of Journal of Physical Chemistry , is a Fellow of the American Physical Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. (Msrasnw (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC))

Speedy close, nomination withdrawn I am a prize idiot - there are ample hits in gnews, but they're all in the achives - which I, for some reason, hadn't checked. Withdrawing nomination per considerable news coverage, and will willingly accept a much deserved {{trout}}. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.