Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arvid Andersen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Arvid Andersen}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arvid Andersen}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Arvid Andersen}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Arvid Andersen]]=

:{{la|1=Arvid Andersen}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Arvid Andersen}})

Subject does not appear to me to be notable, corresponding danish article's only source is a dead database, and never directly linked to a specific page on that database. Gnisacc (talk) 21:12, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Denmark. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:16, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Weak delete: The Danish wiki page has enough info, IF it was sourced. Since it doesn't, it fails notability, and I'm for deletion. LastJabberwocky (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.