Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ascalaph

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Ascalaph]]=

:{{la|Ascalaph}} ([{{fullurl:Ascalaph|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ascalaph}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable software package. Zero hits in Google books and Google scholar, and not that many distinct, relevant hits in Google web either (it's been mentioned in its own website, some mailing lists, and a few other websites). There are no substantial third-party sources about it (note that the four references currently in the article are on basic science and completely irrelevant to the question of the notability of this product) --Itub (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete Nom says it all. Yilloslime (t) 16:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete Not notable, possibly self-promotion. M stone (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete Not notable. In addition to above, no hits in Chem Abstracts or Pubmed. Possible self-promotion. --Kkmurray (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.