Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ash Beckham
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
=[[:Ash Beckham]]=
:{{la|Ash Beckham}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Ash Beckham}})
Subject of article is not yet noteworthy. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep At some point I wanted to nominate her myself, but from another view she does have some coverage in national press. So, unless persuaded, I am for article to stay. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:10, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Okay. I think all of these ideas sound completely reasonable. Should I cancel my request for deletion? Thank you for responding so quickly. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 13:15, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
:Not at all. As I said I was on the fence for this article, so we'll see what other editors have to say. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Like Arthistorian, I'm inclining towards a keep, but it's a perfectly valid nomination. Deb (talk) 13:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 13:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 13:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you all for your kindness. I really enjoy editing Wikipedia pages and I don’t want to break anything. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 20:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I'm on the fence as well. This might be WP:BLP1E with the event being her TEDx Boulder talk. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete giving a TEDx talk is not on its own enough for notability. Nothing else here suggests notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: WP:SIGCOV requires that subjects have significant coverage in reliable publications and unfortunately, Ash Beckham's only notable activity is delivering one TEDx lecture. I'm not seeing sources that discuss any other major endeavors that this gentleman has undertaken. Carajou (talk) 04:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. TEDx does not confer notability and "activist" is not even a claim for notability. Agricola44 (talk) 21:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Insufficient coverage for notability, which is what would be expected consider the minor accomplishments. TedX is barely worth mentioning in an article and does not imply notability . (personally, I regard including it as a signal indicating the possibility either that there may not be much else,or an attempt at promotional padding) DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.