Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Nanda

:{{la|Ashish Nanda}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashish_Nanda Stats])

:({{Find sources|Ashish Nanda}})

Non-notable director of a school. Fails notability for professors/educators ES&L 21:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

*Delete. Non-notable, at least the article failed to establish that and could not find any credible reference on internet search also. Cheers AKS 21:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

• keep some dude has been deleting whole swaths of the article that says why its notable. he is notable because he is the director of the best bussiness school in asia. we have an article for the chairman of the same school. and aless notable director of iim lucknow i am trying to add mor e sources the reason thier are less online sources is because he is a new apoitee. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberalufp (talk • contribs)
• removing of non reliable sources is absolutely appropriate for the article itself and would have provided no additional weight to any "keep" !votes. And the fact that "there are less online sources because he is a new appointee" is verification of the fact that the creation of the article was WP:TOOSOON. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

*not delete her is notable because of the new source added and new ifo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.113.249.51 (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC) — 98.113.249.51 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Struck by ES&L - editors may not !vote twice, and this IP is same editor as Liberalufp ES&L 12:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 21:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 21:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

• Delete. I find a GS h-index of around 8 in a highly cited field. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC).
• Keep. Change vote. User:Salih's find of named chair gives at leat a formal pass of WP:Prof#C5. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC).
• Comment: Director of the topmost business school of India, IIMA. We need to look for reliable sources. Salih (talk) 05:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
• Delete per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
• Delete per Xxanthippe. Keep per named professorship (at Harvard, no less) as shown in the link prvoded by {{u|Salih}}. --Randykitty (talk) 12:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
• Keep. The subject satisfies WP:PROF. Specifically, criteria #5 (the person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.) as evidenced by this link [http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/plp/pages/nanda.php] and #6 (the person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.) as per this [http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/institute/director-message.html]. Salih (talk) 06:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

:keep i agree with salih70.112.61.71 (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

::keep i agree with salih

• Keep. Change vote in line with new references. Cheers AKS 09:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

::* Clarification. I was attempting to strike off my previous vote and erroneously someone else's vote got impacted. EatsShootsAndLeaves, this was not intended. Sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers AKS 10:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

• Keep. Holders of named chairs at major universities are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.