Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashton Grey

=[[Ashton Grey]]=

:{{la|Ashton Grey}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashton_Grey Stats])

:({{Find sources|Ashton Grey}})

Writer with no strong evidence of notability. The article cites just one reliable source, but it's not about him in any meaningful way — besides mentioning his name and providing a brief critical analysis of his book, it contains no substantial information about him at all — and Google turns up no other reliable sources about him. I can't properly verify his claimed death, I can't properly verify his claimed friendship with a convicted killer, and on and so forth. Furthermore, the article was written by somebody who is also mentioned in the body as a collaborator of his, meaning there are WP:COI issues here to boot — which, as always, isn't an unforgiveable sin if there are reliable sources we can use to clean it up. But there aren't. And if I trim it back to the one statement in the entire article that can be properly sourced — i.e. the one statement that already is — then there's simply not enough notability there to justify an article at all. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 09:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete Fails WP:WRITER. His book Sweet Home Chicago was appreciated by Yann Martel, but I can't find any WP:RS reviews (either in general Google search or on the usual review sites). Book was published by a small press which Grey co-founded[http://www.bindlestickpublications.com/2012/08/22/sweet-home-chicago/] which doesn't necessarily prove non-notability, but means he's less likely to get reviews than if he was with one of the bigger publishers or well-known indies. Article mentions another novel Soo Line Sling but I can't find anything about it. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (confer) @ 12:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (deliver) @ 12:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.