Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif Ali Malik

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Asif Ali Malik]]=

:{{la|Asif Ali Malik}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Asif Ali Malik}})

An article on a functionary of the Punjab Bar Council, no independent sources. {{userlinks|Sherry334}} and {{userlinks|Rajput334}} have created a series of articles on functionaries within the Punjab Bar Council, suggesting WP:COI, but the main issue here is lack of reliable independent sources or any objective claim to notability. Guy (Help!) 15:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete - I can find him being quoted or otherwise being mentioned in conjunction with his role on the council (e.g., [http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/print/Top/14-Mar-2009/Bars-slam-action-against-marchers], [http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Regional/Lahore/31-May-2009/Restoration-of-peoples-confidence-must-CJ]) but that does not represent significant coverage about him. He also apparently had his [http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007\12\28\story_28-12-2007_pg7_13 license suspended] but that's really just a news item. According to the article, he has also run as a candidate in an election but was not elected, so he does not mee WP:POLITICIAN. -- Whpq (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete: As per nom, doesn't fulfill notability criterion. Bill william compton (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.