Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspenhoff, Missouri

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Aspenhoff, Missouri}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspenhoff, Missouri}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Aspenhoff, Missouri}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. plicit 12:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Aspenhoff, Missouri]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Aspenhoff, Missouri}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Aspenhoff, Missouri}})

[http://aspenhof.info/ A "recreational community"] (read summer/weekend homes). [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/88724780/aspenhoff/ Developers describe it as] "perfect weekend retreat". Newspapers.com results are almost entirely real estate listings, found even less searching elsewhere. I don't think WP:GEOLAND was intended to make what is essentially a collection of vacation homes notable, and WP:GNG isn't met. Hog Farm Talk 07:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.