Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ata Atun

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by {{user|Jimfbleak}} per WP:CSD#G11, unambiguously promotional material. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

=[[Ata Atun]]=

:{{la|Ata Atun}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ata_Atun Stats])

:({{Find sources|Ata Atun}})

Very badly written (though this is not the reason to delete it), it is like an advert and fails WP:GNG Yash t 101 11:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

: Delete — Written like an advert/resume, and fails to be notable anyway. Ugncreative Usergname (talk) 18:05, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

: Delete This seems to be promotional, and could be considered spam due to the large number of outgoing links. It would require a fundamental rewrite to be encyclopedic, and the sources to do so don't exist. Millermk90 (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete - This looks like it's been copied and pasted from something else. ~Adjwilley (talk) 22:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.