Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atinia (gens)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. postdlf (talk) 20:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Atinia (gens)]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Atinia (gens)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Atinia (gens)}})

This article covers the same Roman family group as the article called Atinia gens. Chewings72 (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Chewings72 (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Chewings72 (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Chewings72 (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Chewings72 (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Chewings72 (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

:: {{u|*Treker}} {{u|P Aculeius}} How embarrassing. My apologies. You are correct. It is Atilia gens. So no duplication. Please accept my withdrawal of AFD. Chewings72 (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

::Okay. *puts away torch and pitchfork* P Aculeius (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Speedy close. Mistaken nomination in good faith, withdrawn. Avilich (talk) 14:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.