Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Au rythme des déluges

=[[Au rythme des déluges]]=

:{{la|Au rythme des déluges}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Au rythme des déluges}})

The article does not meet the notability criteria for books WP:NB Koppas (talk) 15:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


  • Delete. I admit that there's a language barrier here, but even with Google translator I cannot find any articles about this book. There's just nothing out there to show that this book has any notability.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
  • Delete The equivalent French article is also flagged for notability: [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Au_rythme_des_d%C3%A9luges]. That aside, while this book is mentioned in passing in [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=HcdCqb1d_NMC&lpg=PA135&dq=%22Au%20rythme%20des%20d%C3%A9luges%22%20-wikipedia&pg=PA135#v=onepage&q=%22Au%20rythme%20des%20d%C3%A9luges%22%20-wikipedia&f=false a brief profile of the author], that isn't enough and this two sentence unreferenced article is serving no useful purpose. AllyD (talk) 21:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.