Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Gospel Music Association

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[Australian Gospel Music Association]]=

:{{la|Australian Gospel Music Association}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Gospel Music Association}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Australian Gospel Music Association}})

no notability shown for this association. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. nothing satisfying wp:org. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:34, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 08:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete as per nomination. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 12:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete Ironically perhaps, the award it gives out has more legitimate hits than the organization itself. That being said, I couldn't find significant coverage with a simple Google search. That means it fails the test. Sven Manguard _Talk 00:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete 1 gnews hit, hardly any coverage [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Australian+Gospel+Music+Association%22&num=10&hl=en&scoring=a]. LibStar (talk) 14:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.