Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Under-16 Individual Speedway Championship

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 01:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

=[[Australian Under-16 Individual Speedway Championship]]=

:{{la|Australian Under-16 Individual Speedway Championship}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Australian_Under-16_Individual_Speedway_Championship Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Australian Under-16 Individual Speedway Championship}})

fails WP:GNG. an under 16 championship is rarely notable . Could not find any coverage in gnews and gbooks. And I doubt it was covered by major media in Australia. It also seems this article is just a results listing. LibStar (talk) 06:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 08:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 08:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep as I think it would be in the local papers of that area where its being held. But I don't know on that part. Matt294069 is coming 00:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

:: WP:MUSTBESOURCES. LibStar (talk) 08:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete for now at best as my searches found nothing immediately better. SwisterTwister talk 21:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Weak keep I found a reasonable number of primary references. A very small number of weak secondary references. It does need to be properly referenced. Aoziwe (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.