Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authoring language

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Authoring system. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

=[[Authoring language]]=

:{{la|Authoring language}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Authoring language}})

Non-notable software stub. Marked for references and notability since May 2010. Contested prod. A number of researchers call their programming languages an "authoring language" (which seems to mean "a language something gets written in") but term is hugely problematic since the only widely-known "authoring language" is DIAL from the w3c, which isn't a programming language but a mark up language. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Merge with authoring system. —Ruud 07:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

::Comment: authoring system dates from February 2007‎, but has no references. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:44, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

::: {{tl|sofixit}} —Ruud 08:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Merge with authoring system. This is a long-standing term, and TUTOR (programming language) of course the historical important one. Not sure there are enough others to merit an article. W Nowicki (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Merge with authoring system. Topic does not merit separate article. Please see WP:BEFORE section C.4 before nominating these for deletion. --Kvng (talk) 14:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.