Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axel Scherer (engineer)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Axel Scherer (engineer)]]=

:{{la|Axel Scherer (engineer)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Axel_Scherer_(engineer) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Axel Scherer (engineer)}})

No claims of importance can be seen in the article. The references are just passing mentions Anbu121 (talk me) 11:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete Non notable. EE is a trade mag, if you take an ad out you get to write an article. If you send them a press release you get mentioned in an article. Greglocock (talk) 05:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

==some arguments==

On the talk page of Axel Scherer (engineer) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Axel_Scherer_(engineer)] there are some arguments and more links Kiu77 (talk) 12:55, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

:So the Time article says 500 people were turned down. It still doesn't mention Axel Scherer. 500 people might have been rejected for the job I do - that doesn't make me notable. All the rest are passing mentions of something reported in his blog - nothing that would confer notability. Spinning Spark 18:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete no notability established. Spinning Spark 18:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:BASIC Kooky2 (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.