Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B.Y. Vijayendra

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|B.Y. Vijayendra}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=B.Y. Vijayendra}})

Non notable politician who fails to satisfy any of the criterion listed at WP:NPOL. Being a vice president of a political party doesn’t confer automatic notability. Celestina007 (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete as it fails WP:NPOL. No remarkable work done by the subject, no major public office held, no election won. Lacks coverage. Agree with the nominator. Walrus Ji (talk) 08:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Nobility has not been established. Possible WP:UPE violation. I don't see any disclosures. RationalPuff (talk) 10:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
• {{u|RationalPuff}}, agree on the suspicions. The same author has also created :Draft:B.Y Vijayendra Walrus Ji (talk) 11:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

::::@{{u|RationalPuff}} & @{{u|Walrus Ji}} thank you both for pointing out the UPE aspect I didn’t catch that. Celestina007 (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Holding party offices doesn't make him a notable politician. Palmsandbeaches (talk) 05:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete unelected party functionaries at this level are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.