Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLITHCHRON

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. yandman 11:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[BLITHCHRON]]=

:{{la|BLITHCHRON}} ([{{fullurl:BLITHCHRON|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLITHCHRON}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Advert for a non-notable, not yet held fest of purely local interest. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete (G11) as blatant advertisement/processed meat from Hormel. MuZemike 17:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete - A grand total of 6 ghits on this, one of which is Wikipedia. No prejudice against recreating the article when and if it actually becomes notable. §FreeRangeFrog 17:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy G11 or G12. Article is written completely as an ad brochure, the text of which was lifted directly from the website listed, which does assert copyright. If you can get past that, then there's the utter lack of sources to establish notability... Arakunem^Talk 21:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.