Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMTC routes

:{{la|BMTC routes}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|BMTC routes}})

I had nominated the article List of AC buses Bangalore for deletion. In the discussion this user stated that Wikipedia is not a public transport info page. So on the same criteria, I have nominated this article for deletion. It contains route info of BMTC. Abhishek191288 (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Keep - Perfectly encyclopedic list of transit routes in one of India's largest cities. What a single user said on an AfD of a different topic has nothing to do with notability nor consensus of this one. And bizarrely, the nom was also the nom in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of AC buses Bangalore in which he stated "There already exists an article listing the various routes of BMTC. I do feel that it is not required to have a separate article just to mention which of the routes are operated by AC buses. A separate section in the article Feeder and Metro BMTC Routes about what routes are operated by AC buses is quite sufficient." The nom seems confused as to his own preference. --Oakshade (talk) 06:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
• Keep/Merge - Abhishek191288 need to understand the policies of wikipedia not on somebody's comment regarding a deletion as its his own personnel opinion. Dragging another users comments to some other topics is not a good decision moreover you were the nominator of that one. This article can be merged to Transportation of bangalore topic...--...Captain......Tälk tö me 16:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NOTDIRECTORY and this article is just a directory. WP is not supposed to be a "complete exposition of all possible details" and a list of bus routes is not encyclopedic to me. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 23:23, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. Precedent has shown that verifiable lists of bus and other transit routes are perfectly acceptable on Wikipedia, and I see no reason why this example should be any different. Thryduulf (talk) 16:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.