Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backup Direct

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Backup Direct]]=

:{{la|Backup Direct}} ([{{fullurl:Backup Direct|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backup Direct}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Advertising a business Be-technical (talk) 14:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete; fails WP:COMPANY. KuyaBriBriTalk 14:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is most likely notable. See the [http://www.backupdirect.net/awards list of awards] on Backup Direct's website; we would just need to verify these in reliable, independent sources. There also seem to be some news mentions that probably aren't press releases. [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Backup+Direct%22&cf=all]. Overall, this meets WP:WEB, if not WP:N. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per LinguistAtLarge Jenuk1985 | Talk 15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep per Linguist. The article is a stub, so it's just missing references. It seems they do exist. Ancemy (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.