Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandi Isaac

:{{la|Bandi Isaac}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Bandi Isaac}})

No evidence of notability. Borderline A7, but I will err on the side of caution. Not applicable for BLPprod because his youtube channel is linked (supposedly that counts a source). No hits on gbooks or gnews, nothing on google which seems reliable, but YMMV. Yoenit (talk) 20:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

• Comment there are a lot of blogs, but there does not appear to be and reliable inderpandent sources, all my searching seems to confirm nom's conclusions. L888Y5 (talk) 20:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Yes, it looks as if Yoenit is exactly right. It'll have to go. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
• Well, thats a new nickname. Yoenit (talk) 23:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

:::I'm so sorry, slip of the mouse!Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:21, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
• Delete There is no evidence of any notability.Vincelord (talk) 14:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
• Delete . Its true that searching about this person draws a blank. I found only one source (other than blogs)on the website -->http://www.lafindia.org/about%20us.html but don't know whether it can be termed reliable. Vivekananda De--tAlK 12:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.