Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Croatia relations

:{{la|Bangladesh–Croatia relations}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bangladesh%E2%80%93Croatia_relations Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Bangladesh–Croatia relations}})

Tagged for notability for 2.5 years. Relations are the same as Bangladesh has with most countries: no resident ambassadors, no state visits, no bilateral agreements, and negligible economic ties. The Atlas of Economic Complexity shows 2015 bilateral exports from Bangladesh at $12.9M (0.04% of total), and from Croatia at $6.4M (0.05% of total).[http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/explore/tree_map/export/bgd/hrv/show/2015/][http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/explore/tree_map/export/hrv/bgd/show/2015/] Possibly merge to Foreign relations of Croatia, although I don't see anything more than diplomatic boilerplate here.

The cited sources are two Bangladesh government press releases that were reprinted by news agencies without analysis. The press releases were issued on the occasion of Croatia's non-resident ambassador presenting his credentials in 2010, and bidding farewell in 2012. Additional press releases for other envoys exist, but stringing together non-independent primary sources would not make the topic suitable for a stand alone encyclopedia article. No coverage in third party, reliable, secondary sources, so fails WP:GNG. Worldbruce (talk) 00:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

• delete as nom says absence of various things that typically make a notable bilateral relations. the only relations is a very minor level of trade. LibStar (talk) 02:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
• Keep Any 2 countries that have any relation at all should have an article where this relation can be documented. This includes articles with very minimal relations.--INDIAN REVERTER (talk) 22:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC) Blocked WP:VOA. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

::: absolutely not. there is no inherent notability of bilateral articles. in fact 100s of these with very minimal relations have been deleted. LibStar (talk) 23:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

• delete Nothing to establish notability here. Yilloslime ^T_C 16:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.