Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lerner Spectre

:{{la|Barbara Lerner Spectre}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Barbara_Lerner_Spectre Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Barbara Lerner Spectre}})

I can't find any sources establishing notability, just a lot of dodgy neo-Nazi and alt-right conspiracy sites claiming she's the smoking gun for their anti-semitic conspiracy theories. This page is a magnet for this sort of trash. Maybe there are some sources establishing notability in Swedish, but better safe than sorry. Brustopher (talk) 23:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

::Barbara Lerner Spectre is not just some Swedish person. You have personally taken care that anything notable stays out of that article, wiping out references, and you have called a writer (Lars Holger Holm) as a fringe nutter, although there is no evidence that he is any kind of a nutter. All evidence so far has confirmed that the quote you have repeatedly deleted, is in fact just as it appeared in a TV interview. Your way of deleting and diminishing an article before calling for deletion of the whole article, is plain ugly and looks more like a way of vandalism than real constructive contribution. I oppose the deletion of that article. ––Nikolas Ojala (talk) 05:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

:::|For anyone wondering Lars Holger Holm's book is all about a Jewish conspiracy and the secret Jewish agenda and shit. Brustopher (talk) 08:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as the current article is still questionable and my searches are simply finding nothing else better. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

• ({{Find sources AFD|Barbara Spectre}})

• Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC. Source examples include, but are not limited to: [http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2013/12/that_barbara_spectre_video.html "That Barbara Spectre Video"]. American Thinker., [http://www.thejewishweek.com/editorial-opinion/gary-rosenblatt/dont-write-european-jewry "Don’t Write Off European Jewry"]. The Jewish Week., [http://www.algemeiner.com/2016/03/18/recognizing-antisemitism-is-the-first-step-to-fighting-it/ "Recognizing Antisemitism Is the First Step to Fighting It"]. Algemeiner Journal., [https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-10028692.html "Visions of Venice"]. The Jerusalem Report. Quote: "... Institute, a fascinating experiment in Jewish education created by Barbara Spectre, an American-Israeli, with funding from the Swedish government...the curriculum is pluralistic and eclectic goes without saying. Barbara Spectre - who ...". {{paywall}}, [https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-20527758.html "A Smorgasbord of Empowerment"]. The Jerusalem Report. Quote: "Cofounded by Dr. Barbara Spectre, a pleasant, relaxed, 67-year- old American-born Conservative Jew who is a professional educator, and several ...". {{paywall}}, [https://books.google.com/books?id=V-4uAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Barbara+Spectre%22&dq=%22Barbara+Spectre%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwim4JSq1o3MAhVS8mMKHZN2AE0Q6AEIQjAG A Century of Commitment]. p. 207. {{paywall}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

• Keep – I already said this (above), but just to make that more visible, I say again. North America brought us few sources. Quite obviously BLS is not just some random person who founded some random organization. ——Nikolas Ojala (talk) 11:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.