Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bargn Farmaceutici Phils. Co.
=[[Bargn Farmaceutici Phils. Co.]]=
:{{la|Bargn Farmaceutici Phils. Co.}} ([{{fullurl:Bargn Farmaceutici Phils. Co.|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bargn Farmaceutici Phils. Co.}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Doesn't meet WP:N. I am tempted to speedy for WP:A7. Gordonrox24 | Talk 18:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Strong delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Google search gave no reliable sources to back up notability. Online mentions include Philippine patent office which tells us that they have a trademark, this article, their company's own websites and listings in various directories and forums.--Lenticel (talk) 05:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, I declined your recent A7 tagging of it as it does make a rough assertion of some notability - but there are no sources available to back that assertion up. ~ mazca talk 17:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
:Ok thanks for letting me know.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - claims of notability are not backed up by decent sources. Bearian (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.