Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Werner Ünderbheit

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of characters from The Venture Bros.#Archvillains and henchmen. NW (Talk) 02:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Baron Werner Ünderbheit]]=

:{{la|Baron Werner Ünderbheit}} ([{{fullurl:Baron Werner Ünderbheit|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Werner Ünderbheit}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Baron Werner Ünderbheit}})

Non-notable bit character in The Venture Bros. who's article consists of unsourced original research and unsubstantiated claims. Basically a fanpage. Wikipedia is not a fansite. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 13:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 13:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep and reference better, very well written fictional biography. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep Nice article, and a memorable reoccurring character from a notable series. Dream Focus 18:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment You know better than that Dream: notability isn't inherited nor based off a character's series weight.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to the character list, unless someone can substantially prove the character has stand-alone reception and development information. Given this is a lesser recurring villain in the show compared to several other characters, that may be quite difficult. "It's a pretty article" isn't going to cut it.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete and redirect as above. NN character with no real world significance or demonstrable impact to justify standalone encyclopedic treatment. Eusebeus (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Redirect or delete. I love the venture bros, but there just isn't enough sourcing relating to this character to support a standalone article. Protonk (talk) 09:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Werner Ünderbheit||}}

Redirect to List of characters from The Venture Bros.#Archvillains and henchmen as the best alternative to deletion. This is a valid search term, and information about Baron Werner Ünderbheit is already present in the article/section I linked to above. Cunard (talk) 23:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to List of characters from The Venture Bros.#Archvillains and henchmen Please. Abductive (reasoning) 00:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Redirect as above, character is non-notable and even if it were, should be included in primary article. No valid reasons given to keep. Drawn Some (talk) 18:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.