Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BashBurn

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. m.o.p 05:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

=[[BashBurn]]=

:{{la|BashBurn}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|BashBurn}})

I found [http://books.google.com/books?id=8KtV4fW3dVMC&pg=PA40&dq=bashburn&hl=en&ei=2o_eTobjFuaosQKc6pyrBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=bashburn&f=false this], but I don't consider it significant coverage. Even if it was significant coverage, there needs to be multiple sources. SL93 (talk) 22:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete. I agree with the nom. There nothing out there that rises above the trivial, hardly surprising given the trivial nature of a shell script to burn discs. Yawn. Msnicki (talk) 21:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.