Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Mundamala Ghat

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Battle of Mundamala Ghat}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Battle of Mundamala Ghat}})

Context not found in any of the cited references. The battle name is not recognized by any of the historians. Seems like source manipulation Imperial^[AFCND] 15:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Bangladesh, and India. Owen× ☎ 15:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
• Delete what references, looks uncited? Slatersteven (talk) 16:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
• :@Slatersteven: the nominator removed some content with references, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Mundamala_Ghat&oldid=1189185772 this] is a version before the removal. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
• ::And which ones actually pass wp:v, or (come to that) wp:rs, a snippet, really? Slatersteven (talk) 10:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
• ::@Deltaspace42, Certainly. I removed it after reviewing the references but couldn't locate the contexts used by the creator. The article appears to involve citation manipulation, and there is no mention of "Battle of Mundamala Ghat" anywhere. I encountered a source in what seems to be a local language, possibly Bengali, where not even the author's name isn't provided. How could I access and examine the verifiability from that source? After examining the snippets from the provided links, none of them reference "Mundamala Ghat" or the belligerent's name. If you have the information, please verify it by assessing its reliability and notability. Imperial^[AFCND] 11:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
• Delete based on WP:V and WP:SYNTH. If there are no solid, secondary sources that discussion this event specifically as the 'Battle of Mundamala Ghat' (and I can't find any), the article is a synthesis of sources and thus invalid for mainspace. An AtD of Draftify would be possible, but I just don't see any sources on which to build an encyclopaedic article. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.