Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful Small Machines

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Beautiful Small Machines]]=

:{{la|Beautiful Small Machines}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Beautiful Small Machines}})

fails WP:BAND. hardly any coverage [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Beautiful+Small+Machines%22&num=10&hl=en&scoring=a]. I have also nominated their EP album for deletion. LibStar (talk) 13:02, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete:Generally non notable band which also fails to pass WP:BAND criteria. The template {{tl|Beautiful Small Machines}} will also need deleting. Mattg82 (talk) 02:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete ditto to Mattg82's comments. — fcsuper^{(How's That?, That's How!)} _{([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Exclusionism Exclusionistic] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Immediatism Immediatist] )}— 05:48, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.