Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedok North Avenue 3
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 14:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
=[[Bedok North Avenue 3]]=
:{{la|Bedok North Avenue 3}} – (
:({{Find sources|Bedok North Avenue 3}})
Not a notable road Fails WP:GNG. Notability not established Flat Out let's discuss it''' 23:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No indication this road is notable as a standalone topic. Notability is not inherited from the presence of otherwise notable buildings, such as schools. --Kinu t/c 02:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete wp:notability is a measure of attention that a topic attracts from the world at large. For public roads, map makers including Google report locations on maps, and government agencies respond if a road is not passable. Google maps [https://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&gbv=2&q=Bedok+North+Avenue+3&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Bedok+North+Avenue+3,+Bedok,+Singapore&gl=us&ll=1.331114,103.93384&spn=0.019264,0.027595&t=m&z=15&vpsrc=6] shows that this is a major connector in the area. The problem here is that there are no references and the claims made are indistinguishable from WP:OR. If someone fixes the WP:OR and WP:V problems in the current article, or wants to Userfy or Incubate, I will change my !vote accordingly. Unscintillating (talk) 13:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- 'Comment Would an American road of similar size be kept? --Hildanknight (talk) 16:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Without any sources or any indication of notability, no. I see no evidence of systemic bias here. --Kinu t/c 04:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - We don't need articles for individual roads unless extremely notable. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 18:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.