Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Szerlip

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Benjamin Szerlip}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Szerlip}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Benjamin Szerlip}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 22:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Benjamin Szerlip]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Benjamin Szerlip}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Benjamin Szerlip}})

A WP:PROMO bio for a non-notable osteopath. I don't see a pass on WP:GNG since I can't find any WP:SIGCOV in independent, reliable sources. I don't see a pass on WP:NACADEMIC as his papers are not heavily cited. I don't see a pass on WP:NAUTHOR since I can't find any reviews for his book. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.