Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bente Lyon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 00:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

=[[Bente Lyon]]=

:{{la|Bente Lyon}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bente_Lyon Stats])

:({{Find sources|Bente Lyon}})

Drug smugglers and brothel keepers are ten-a-penny; lacks the required significant coverage to satisfy WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 19:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Weak delete' - Like said, dime a dozen. No coverage that's enough for me to say notable at this time that I can find. gwickwiretalkediting 20:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep - She is a celebrity. Norway's only publicly known convicted brothel keeper, convicted drug trafficker with experience as a prostitute, who has written a book that has been portrayed on NRK. --Normash (talk) 21:30, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep She's apparently nationally known as a brothel keeper. "A dime a dozen" implies that nobody in that profession can be notable, which is conceivably a moral judgment or a POV, but not an appropriate way to make a modern encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 21:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. She works hard for the WP:RS. Qworty (talk) 23:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep. Extensive national media coverage over a period of years, meets GNG. I will add additional sources if no one else adds them first. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. As for the moral judgement of the profession, I think it is relevant to point out that being a brothel keeper = organizing prostitution is illegal in Norway, and that the article should be treated as a BLP about a person only or primarily known for crime, specifically two trials. (This may also explain why she basically is the only well-known brothel keeper in Norway and not one of a dozens: media in Norway normally protects the identity of criminals). There was extensive media coverage of the trials, the coverage itself has been subjected to [http://kilden.forskningsradet.no/c17251/artikkel/vis.html?tid=24624 scholarly analysis] (in Norwegian). The coverage focused heavily on the indidual's role and she willingly participated to it. After the second trial, she published a self-biography which sold ca. 1,300 ex. and she was interviewed in NRK about, which may make her semi-notable as an author. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 10:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. — Joaquin008 (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.