Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard London

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The relists have yielded enough dispute as to close this as a no consensus. KaisaL (talk) 02:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

=[[Bernard London]]=

:{{la|Bernard London}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bernard_London Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Bernard London}})

Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. LK (talk) 04:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:27, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep. I tried to clean up the article a bit and I added a few footnotes (See, e.g.: {{cite book |last=Cooper |first=Tim |date=2012 |title=Longer Lasting Products: Alternatives To The Throwaway Society |url=https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zq9t5dc-gGUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA11 |location= |publisher=Gower Publishing |page=11 |isbn=1409458873}}{{cite book |last=Angeli |first=Franco |editor1-last=Calabro |editor1-first=Grazia |editor2-last=D'Amico |editor2-first=Augusto |editor3-last=Lanfranchi |editor3-first=Maurizio |editor4-last=Moschella |editor4-first=Giovani |editor5-last=Pulejo |editor5-first=Luisa |date=2011 |title=Moving from the Crisis to Sustainability: Emerging Issues in the International Context |url=https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JXI8dQQFwG0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA239 |location= |publisher= |page=239 |isbn=8856847051}}{{cite journal |last=Nørgård |first=Jørgen S. |date=2013 |title=Happy degrowth through more amateur economy |url=http://degrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Norgard-2013.pdf |journal=Journal of Cleaner Production |publisher= |volume=38 |issue= |pages=61-70 |doi= |access-date=June 23, 2016}}{{cite book |last=Slade |first=Giles |date=2009 |title=Made to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9GdxQSLeFmYC |location= |publisher=Harvard University Press |page=72-75, 290 |isbn=0674043758}}). There are many scholars who discuss London and the fact that he coined the phrase planned obsolescence, and for that reason, this article passes WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 11:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep as improved references detailed above have improved the article so that WP:BASIC is passed, and he nas had significant impact on economic discussion.Atlantic306 (talk) 22:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.