Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernardo Huberman

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Bernardo Huberman}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Bernardo Huberman}})

Article lacks secondary sources to establish notability of Bernado Huberman. Sources appear primary, commercial or autobiographical in nature. I am unable to find evidence of secondary coverage in news or google scholar. The citations provided are simply links to a few books he edited or authored. Zenomonoz (talk) 08:23, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Science. Zenomonoz (talk) 08:23, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
• Comment - according to Google Scholar he has an h-index of 103; on Scopus, his h-index is 65. His work is highly cited by others (GS: 62,726) Netherzone (talk) 13:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
• :That is not evidence of notability. He lacks significant coverage in secondary sources. Zenomonoz (talk) 17:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
• Strong keep per WP:NACADEMIC as {{tq|The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics).}}. I looked into notability a while back and added a citation so this is documented. [https://www.aps.org/programs/honors/fellowships/archive-all.cfm?initial=&year=1981&unit_id=DCMP&institution=Xerox]. Fellow of APS (American Physical Society) is clearly highly selective honor akin to the Institute of Physics that's mentioned in the policy. Note that nominator prodded this first [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bernardo_Huberman&diff=prev&oldid=1176996865]. Nominator self-reverted the prod, only realized now, sorry. AncientWalrus (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC) AncientWalrus (talk) 16:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
• :Ok, was not aware being a fellow of institutes was sufficient to establish notability. I would note it is a guideline, not a rule. But Huberman’s coverage in books and news is lacking IMO. Zenomonoz (talk) 17:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
• Keep - He clearly meets several criteria of our guidelines for a notable academic, thus passes WP:NPROF. An academic only needs to meet one criteria of that SNG. His Index scores are high 103 h-index on Google Scholar, 65 h-index on Scopus, his work has been cited over 62-thousand times (62,716), therefore he has made a substantial impact on his field. Friendly question to nominator {{u|Zenomonoz}}: How many more book and journal articles does his work need to be cited in to be "enough" (and not lacking) in your opinion? Additionally I am finding numerous reviews of his books in academic journals, therefore meets WP:GNG. In addition, he's a Fellow of several notable associations: Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fellow, Japan Society for the Advancement of Science, Fellow, American Physical Society{{Cite web |title=APS Fellow Archive |url=https://www.aps.org/programs/honors/fellowships/archive-all.cfm?initial=&year=1981&unit_id=DCMP&institution=Xerox |access-date=2023-09-25 |website=www.aps.org |language=en}}, CECOIA Prize on Economics and Artificial Intelligence, IBM Prize of the Society for Computational Economics, Trustee, Aspen Center for Physics, Chairman, Council of Fellows at Xerox Corporation and a Senior Fellow at HP Labs, where he also happened to be the Director of the Mechanisms and Design Lab. Please review WP:BEFORE. Netherzone (talk) 19:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

• : happy to withdraw AfD nomination, although I would like to see some of those reviews for confirmation. I don’t think a single page noting that he is a fellow is sufficient content for a Wikipedia article, so yes, other sources would be needed to establish the notability of his contributions. Zenomonoz (talk) 19:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC)