Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Home Chef

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Best Home Chef]]=

:{{la|Best Home Chef}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Best_Home_Chef Stats])

:({{Find sources|Best Home Chef}})

This cooking competition, having been founded this month, is extremely unlikely to meet notability guidelines. Performing searches in the usual venues with restrictions on time to prevent false positives turned up only [http://www.current.com.au/2012/10/02/article/Winning-Appliances-offers-100000-for-Australias-Best-Home-Chefs/CGYNSZEMIG.html this article], and alone, it does not warrant the presence of an encyclopedia article on this competition. CtP (t • c) 00:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Grill and season with Murray River salt flakes - so non-notable it might almost run 360* and become notably laughable. Created by an SPA with almost the same track-record as the SPA who created the Winning Appliances article - the company that launched this competition. ZERO independent coverage - I have a sneaking suspicion WP is being used to promo something. Fee-fi-fo-fum, I smell the blood of a PR someone. Grill it... on a beautiful Smeg stove-top. Stalwart111 (talk) 03:29, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

:Comment I am normally all about disambiguation, but I now see that there are times when it might be best to leave the stove-top in its most amplified glory, with all its knobs shining and all its burners blasting. I learn as I live. FeatherPluma (talk) 16:44, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:59, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:59, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete for now - Considering the news article above was published only two weeks ago, it may be too soon for any additional and significant information. My news searches at both Google US and Australia provided nothing useful. SwisterTwister talk 22:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.