Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best city

:{{la|Best city}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Best_city Stats])

:({{Find sources|Best city}})

The article doesn't have any significance to be included in the encyclopedia, doesn't have neutral point of view, few source(s), non-notable Mediran ^talk 10:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

• Delete, only source is a master's thesis, so POV issue (lack of balance) looms large, and notability certainly isn't established. Whether 'Best xxx' can be an encyclopedic topic is a matter for debate; certainly "Best..." invites POV writing, but if a range of sources is available it might be possible to write neutrally about it. Whether this article is a suitable place to begin for that project is doubtful: it sets out a particular bunch of criteria, which other sources probably wouldn't agree with, so comparison would involve starting again - i.e. WP:TNT. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.