Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd}}

:{{la|Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd}} ([{{fullurl:Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails WP:CORP. Company has received only trivial coverage in the media. Article was previously deleted in October 2006, and has been continuously tagged as an advertisement since it was recreated in November 2006. —BradV 23:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep. Only trivial coverage in the media? I've added a reference to the article from one of the [http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22beximco+pharmaceuticals%22+source%3A%22-pharma%22&btnG=Search+Archives&num=50&ie=UTF-8&as_price=p0 559 Google news archive hits] which says that this is the leading drug manufacturer in the world's 7th most populous country. You can't get much more notable than that. If there are problems with the content they can be fixed by editing, not deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

:Speedy keep Per Phil Geoff Plourde (talk) 08:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy keep - silly nomination - David Gerard (talk) 13:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.