Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bezel Engine

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Bezel Engine}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bezel Engine}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Bezel Engine}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 01:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Bezel Engine]]=

:{{la|1=Bezel Engine}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Bezel Engine}})

This video game engine does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT. Most of the sources I could find were primary sources from Nintendo, blogs, or press releases. A quick search through Japanese sources provided nothing of use. Sparkl^talk 01:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software. Sparkl^talk 01:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete Does not appear notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.