Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhortal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation. {{ping|Sambhil32}}: it's fine to tag an article for speedy deletion if it's already listed at AfD. Hut 8.5 21:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Bhortal]]=

:{{la|Bhortal}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bhortal Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Bhortal}})

non notable, doesn't seem to have the potential to evolve into a good article Hyxl4161 (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 January 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Delete. Too new. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment - The article has been nominated for CSD G12 for copyright violation. I do not know if two different deletion tags can be placed on the same article! Sambhil32 (talk) 20:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.