Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bidule

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 23:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Bidule]]=

:{{la|1=Bidule}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Bidule}})

Fails WP: GNG. I couldn't find sufficient sourcing to establish notability. The review that exists in the article is quite nice, but notability usually requires multiple reliable sources, and I couldn't find any outside of the review that is already cited in the article. HyperAccelerated (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Valley2city ^‽ 20:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Delete for lack significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 22:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete: The sources in this article do not show significant coverage. Kolano • talk 21:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.