Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BigBellyFilm

=[[BigBellyFilm]]=

:{{la|BigBellyFilm}} ([{{fullurl:BigBellyFilm|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BigBellyFilm}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Also included in this nomination:

Another series of articles on a film company by one creator whose sole claim to fame is awards won at possible insignificant film festivals whose articles were created by the same user (see here for my last nomination of a similar series by this user). [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&ned=us&q=BigBellyFilm&ie=UTF-8 No news coverage]. Only Ghits are to user driven sites (Myspace, IMDB, YouTube, etc.) and their official web site. No secondary sources. No reason to believe this company, their employees, and their films are at all notable. Articles fail WP:BIO, WP:CORP, WP:MOVIE. Redfarmer (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. I left a note at the possibly misguided editors talk. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CWii(Talk|Contribs) 01:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete all as unverifiable info, failing all sorts of notability guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 01:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. non-notable.Renee (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete all Does not appear notable, when I read the articles I feel like it's a series of advertisements. --NickPenguin(contribs) 02:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.