Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioline allergy

:{{la|Bioline allergy}} ([{{fullurl:Bioline allergy|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioline allergy}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. Mostly advertising, with no assertion of notability. References amount to self-pub and non-RS, excluding the majority which are wikipedia urls. Format and writing style also suggests possible copyvio. Verbal chat 10:41, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

• Copyvio note According to google translate, the page looks like a copyvio of the foreign language references: http://walshpharma.com/products/bioline/allergy.htm and other http://walshpharma.com pages. Verbal chat 10:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Possibly even speedy under G11. Not much of worth here that isn't blatant promotion and possible copyvio. Gigs (talk) 13:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete It's a copyright violation promoting a non-notable mix of chemicals? Doesn't even seem to make a claim to notability. Any reason it shouldn't be deleted? Nevard (talk) 14:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, I'd already nominated this as a prod on the basis of no notability and no reliable sources. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Blatant copyvio, even if the material being infringed upon isn't in English..., also G11 - 2 ... says you, says me 19:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.