Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitag
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Nightfury 08:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Bitag]]=
:{{la|Bitag}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Bitag}})
Completing nomination on behalf of {{u|OccultaCogitat}}, here is [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion&diff=805880815&oldid=805478026 their statement from WT:AFD]:
{{prettyquote|Requesting to complete the AFD nomination for the "Bitag" page found within the Wikipedia. A lot of info is questionable and there are only a few references pertaining to the TV show. Most references and external links pose little significance to the entirety of the article itself. Personnel found in the infobox is no longer associated with my colleague who happens to run the TV show.
As much as I want to edit its contents, I lack the proper references to do so.
Kind regards,
OccultaCogitat (talk) 06:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)}}
I have no opinion about the subject. SoWhy 06:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SoWhy 07:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. SoWhy 07:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment have removed some unreferenced sections, could you perhaps remove more unreferenced material rather than delete? Atlantic306 (talk) 17:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Per WP:TVSERIES. Bitag apparently airs on People's Television Network, which is the official national network. The investigative series Bitag regularly gets covered in popular media,[http://www.philstar.com/psn-opinyon/2013/02/01/903412/bitag-ngayong-sabado-na][http://www.newsflash.org/2002/08/sb/sb002375.htm][http://www.mindanews.com/top-stories/2012/01/malaybalay-city-employees-in-shabu-session-caught-on-cam-no-charges-filed/][http://www.philstar.com/metro/26285/tabloid-editor-nabbed-extort-try][http://manilabulletin.epaperflip.com/MB071414/3F279BCB6570163B680C2F3B56BE3584/MB071414opt.pdf]... There was perhaps no need to prompt this into an Afd; the newbie editor could have been guided on WP:TVSERIES. Lourdes 03:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Though I was just brought into this AfD nomination by familiarity with the topic of the article, I agree with above. If you can add any usable RS or update the article, why don't you do it yourself. The TV show as a public service has played a role in resolving corrupt practices and crime as a media between the people and law enforcement and the courts, and regular media coverage is enough to keep this here. -TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 04:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.