Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Field

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete from mainspace and userfy for User:MichaelQSchmidt. Cool3 (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Black Field]]=

:{{la|Black Field}} ([{{fullurl:Black Field|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Field}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable film which has yet to be released. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete per nomination. When it's released, and if it shows itself to be noteworthy, a new article can be made. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. As said, if and when it's released, it might be notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete - unreleased film (for now), and no assertations of notability. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 20:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Weak delete without prejudice and userfy to me at User:MichaelQSchmidt/workspace/Black Field. I have just given the article a needed cleanup and sourcing. It is currently in post-production and just barely tickles the WP:GNG. I'd like to be able to bring this back in a few months when it gets released and is reviewed. As the feature debut of an award-wining director, it is getting early attention. More will doubtless be forthcoming. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.