Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bladder Run

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per G11 by {{user|Jimfbleak}}. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

=[[Bladder Run]]=

:{{la|Bladder Run}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bladder_Run Stats])

:({{Find sources|Bladder Run}})

Contested PROD. This film looks interesting, but the only source I could find about it was [http://www.birminghammail.net/news/top-stories/2008/11/11/birmingham-version-of-blade-runner-97319-22222422/ this one] from a local newspaper, meaning it fails the notability guidelines for films. The film might qualify for an article after it is released if it is reviewed by other newspapers or film critics, but for now it is probably too soon for it to have an article. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 15:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.