Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blyton Group

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Blyton Group]]=

:{{la|Blyton Group}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Blyton_Group Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Blyton Group}})

The subsidiary companies in this group may be notable, but this holding corporation doesn't pass WP:NCORP. 1292simon (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Keep Looks like notable. Found some reliable references. Priyanjali singh (talk) 09:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep - owns notable facilities and has received independent coverage. Deus et lex (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep: passes as per WP:RADIO. -Hatchens (talk) 03:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.