Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Plamondon

:{{la|Bob Plamondon}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bob_Plamondon Stats])

:({{Find sources|Bob Plamondon}})

Doesn't pass WP:POLITICIAN, he has ran for a national position but he hasn't held it. Doesn't pass WP:AUTHOR or WP:ACADEMIC, I can't find sources saying that his books had high impact in the field, the Blue Thunder book has some coverage but not enough to fit the criteria. Someone removed the prod saying "sourced" but that doesn't address the problem. Enric Naval (talk) 15:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:33, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

---

• Keep Blue Thunder is just about notable with reviews/articles[http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/entertainment/books/blue-thunder-reveals-what-works-for-tories.html?viewAllComments=y][http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/614795], and this restricted-access journal[http://www.erudit.org/revue/PS/2010/v29/n1/039963ar.html?vue=resume&mode=restriction]. He lists some more on his website that aren't online[http://www.bluethundertalk.com/reviews-for-blue-thunder-1], but we can't be sure they're real printed reviews (the National Post review seems to have mysteriously vanished). He's therefore notable as an author. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

:* WP:AUTHOR asks for "has won significant critical attention". If this is his only notable book, we should move the article to Blue Thunder (book) and refocus it. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:AUTHOR#3, "The person has created...a significant or well-known work...that has been the subject...of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Cavarrone (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
• :In which case, here's [http://www.quillandquire.com/reviews/review.cfm?review_id=6572 another review]. -- Trevj (talk) 13:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.