Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Von Haden

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

=[[Bob Von Haden]]=

:{{la|Bob Von Haden}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bob_Von_Haden Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Bob Von Haden}})

WP:BLP of a city councillor in a city with a population of 65K, which is not large enough to confer notability on a city councillor under WP:NPOL. Further, the article focuses on completely generic and pretty WP:ROUTINE accomplishments like voting for a community pool and against a jail, and is nowhere near being substantive enough to make him uniquely notable among the thousands of other city councillors across the United States who voted for community pools and against jails without qualifying for Wikipedia articles. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 10:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:25, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete City council members in cities this size are no where near notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:17, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete as not clearing the WP:POLITICIAN high bar. One who is elected to the city council of a major metropolis clears the bar, Eau Claire doesn't meet the standard. Carrite (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.