Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogans on the Run
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:56, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
=[[Bogans on the Run]]=
:{{la|Bogans on the Run}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Bogans on the Run}})
Notability, no references, primary sources, tone, orphan, no edits in past year. This article has no notability to speak of, no references at all, and an extremely unencyclopedic tone. The few page views it has been attracting is likely to be because the title contains the word "bogan", which is Australian slang for an uncultured person from the outer suburban areas. Such readers are looking for a WP article on "bogan", and leave as soon as they realize what it's really about. When editors are suffering the rigors of the AfC process, and see that unworthy articles like this are able to survive, they become very disheartened. Deleting articles like this raises the standard overall. CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - The article was either an advertisement or copied from an advertisement. The programme it promotes was broadcast very briefly on an obscure internet channel nearly 7 years ago. Since that time, even the SPAs which created the article have lost all interest, so we can safely presume the show is lacking in the required notability. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 03:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:31, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Article reads like an advertisement. --Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 08:07, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - attempts notability by association, but association is slight and no significant independent sources provided The-Pope (talk) 15:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.