Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bondage hood (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Bondage hood}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Bondage hood}})

Does not appear to be independently notable. No references demonstrate this to me. Merrill Stubing (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

• Question for the nominator. What has changed since the keep at the previous AFD? Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep per previous keep, as nothing has changed since then.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

::Nothing has changed is the problem. ONE source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merrill Stubing (talk • contribs) 15:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

• Keep Current source is sufficient, though more would be preferable. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep -- a bit of Googling will show a vast number of hits, and, in addition to the cite given already, there are lots of mentions of both "gimp mask" and "bondage hood" in Google's News Archive, many of which would be suitable as cites: see [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Gimp+Mask#q=Gimp+Mask&hl=en&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&prmd=ivns&source=lnt&sa=X&fp=7d0885494f208d8a], [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Gimp+Mask#sclient=psy&hl=en&tbs=nws:1%2Car%3A1&q=%22bondage+hood%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&fp=7d0885494f208d8a] -- The Anome (talk) 22:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep - simply notable.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.