Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booze Bait

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Booze Bait]]=

:{{la|Booze Bait}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Booze Bait}})

Procedural nom for IP editor: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Booze_Bait&oldid=314807628 rationale] from talk page:- PROD removed by creator (with absolutely no improvements), but the reasons are the same - it doesn't meet the criteria for notability or reliable sources. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC) - No opinion myself. ascidian | talk-to-me 17:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Delete No claim to notability and most assuredly is not. Miami33139 (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete - non-notable product. Giant Snowman 11:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete - found this, [http://carolinanewswire.com/news/News.cgi?database=00001news.db&command=viewone&id=60&op=t], but it looks like a press release. "Booze Bait is notable as it is the first commercially available top water tackle to specifically employ a contiguous "wine cork & bottle cap" design." I love that line. (a) people could be sticking together wine corks and bottle caps all the time, but just not "commercially"; (b) the use of "contiguous" instead of "glued together, (c) fish don't eat cork and beer caps very readily. --Milowent (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.